Barack obama meet the press 2007 guns

NRA chief repeats call for 'good guys with guns' after navy yard shooting | US news | The Guardian

barack obama meet the press 2007 guns

Barack Obama Meet the Press I know or guns, and never appeared as a guest on the September 7, , broadcast of Meet the Press. 30, broadcast of NBC's 'Meet the Press,' featuring Mike Huckabee (R) and Sen. Huckabee and the senator from Illinois, Democrat Barack Obama. .. citizens having gun ownership rights, those are not the marks of a. Why Obama's election also yielded a strange new obsession with gun rights. As Obama traveled to Oregon to meet with the families of shooting Right now, I can imagine the press releases being cranked out: We need more guns, for gun rights jumped wildly from 48 percent in to 75 percent in.

But one thing I know, that the behavior one practices is a choice. We may have certain tendencies, but how we behave and how we carry out our behavior--but the important issue that I want to address, because I think when you bring up the faith question, Tim, I've been asked more about my faith than any person running for president.

I'm OK with that. I hope I've answered these questions very candidly and very honestly. I think it's important for us to talk about it.

But the most important thing is to find out, does our faith influence our public policy and how? I've never tried to rewrite science textbooks. I've never tried to come out with some way of imposing a doctrinaire Christian perspective in a way that is really against the Constitution. I've never done that. But you said you would ban all abortions. Well, that's not just because I'm a Christian, that's because I'm an American.

Dec. 7: President-elect Barack Obama - Meet the Press | NBC News

Our founding fathers said that we're all created equal. I think every person has intrinsic worth and value But many Americans believe that that would be, that would be you imposing your faith belief It's not a faith belief. It's deeper than that. It's a human belief. It goes to the heart of who we are as a civilization.

If I believe that your intrinsic worth is not changed by your ancestry, your last name, by your IQ, by your abilities or disabilities, if I value your life and respect it with dignity and worth because it is human, then that's what draws me to the inescapable conclusion that I should be for the sanctity of every and each human life. That's why we go after that year-old boy in the woods of North Carolina when he's lost, not because he has greater worth than someone else, but because we believe he has equal worth as everyone else.

I like it that in this country we treat each other--at least we should--with that sense of equality. Our founding fathers penned that in the Declaration of Independence when they declared Some Americans believe that life does not begin at conception, and that it's Well, scientifically I think that's almost How, how could you say that life doesn't begin at conception Do you respect that view?

I respect it as a view, but I don't think it has biological credibility.

barack obama meet the press 2007 guns

And what would happen to doctors or women who participated in abortion? It's always the, the point of trying to say, "Are you going to criminalize it? Well, if it, if it's illegal, it would be. And I think you don't punish the woman, first of all, because it's not about--I consider her a victim, not a, not a criminal. But you would punish the doctor. I think if a doctor knowingly took the life of an unborn child for money, and that's why he was doing it, yeah, I think you would, you would find some way to sanction that doctor.

I don't know that you'd put him in prison, but there's something to me untoward about a person who has committed himself to healing people and to making people alive who would take money to take an innocent life and to make that life dead. There's something that just doesn't ring true about the purpose of medical practice when the first rule of the Hippocratic Oath is "First, do no harm.

October you told me you're going to win Iowa caucuses. Oh I hope so, Tim, I really do. No, you said you were. Well, Thursday night I'll let you know.

But let me tell you this, we're being outspent to-1 here. If we do, you're going to have a political story like you've never had coming out of Iowa on Friday morning. Would it be a miracle? No, I'm just teasing. Thanks for joining us. Democratic Senator Barack Obama, after this station break, live from Iowa.

  • ‘Meet the Press’ transcript for Dec. 30, 2007
  • Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick claims states where people carry guns have less crime
  • 'Meet the Press' transcript for Dec. 7, 2008

Edwards, 24; Clinton, 23; Obama, 22; Richardson, 12; Biden, 8. You slipped a few points into third place. What--can you react to that? How do you react to that? Well, you know, I've been just coming off, you know, a tour of eastern Iowa.

We are seeing unbelievable crowds. Every single place we go, crowds that are two, three times what we're seeing in, in some of the other campaigns, so we know the enthusiasm is there, the energy is there. We have as good of an organization, I think, as people have ever seen in Iowa. And this is going to be a tight race, and I think the polls are going to be bouncing up and down over the next five days.

But what we're confident about is that, if our folks come to the caucus and participate, that we're going to do very well. But without a big turnout, you could be in trouble?

Well, I, I think everybody's predicting a big turnout at this point. I mean, we have seen the kinds of enthusiasm and energy that is remarkable, and, and it's an indication of how badly I think people are looking for change right now. They understand that we can't keep on doing what we've been doing.

Barack Obama On Meet the Press Sept. 7, 2008?

They are responding to a message that we can bring the country together, that we can push the special interests and lobbyists out of setting the agenda in Washington, and they're particularly responding, I think, to the idea that we need some straight talk with the American people about how we're going to meet the challenges ahead. Let me turn to Pakistan. Do you believe the elections scheduled for January 8th should be postponed?

Well, I think it--the key is to make sure that there's legitimacy to those elections. And given the enormous tragedy that has happened, I think that it is understandable if those elections are delayed slightly. But, but it's important that they are not used--that this is not used as an excuse to put off, indefinitely, elections.

And so my main concern is making sure that the opposition parties feel comfortable that they have the opportunity to participate in fair and free elections. That also means, by the way, that we reinstate an independent judiciary in Pakistan, that they are making sure that there is a free press, that the campaigning can proceed. Because our primary interest is making sure that whatever government emerges in Pakistan is viewed as legitimate.

And one of the things that we haven't focused on is that the vast majority of the Pakistani people are moderate and believe in rule of law. That's who we want as allies in the fight against Islamic extremism.

If, in fact, there are elections a year from now, will you return back to Pakistan and run for prime minister? Well, I would very much like to return to Pakistan and run for prime minister again, and my party has been urging the military regime to have negotiations that can facilitate such a transfer. We would like General Musharraf to show me that I could return in safety and contest those elections.

Well, look, I think an investigation has to be completed to determine how the suicide bomber got as close to the former prime minister as he did, what exactly happened. And that's why it's so important for us to ensure that we are providing all the assistance we can to the Pakistani government and that the Pakistani government is pressured to include opposition figures and, and people who are credible in the investigation process.

Until we know exactly what happened, I think it would be premature to judge that. What I do know, though, is that, moving forward, we have to have credible elections and we have to continue to pressure the Musharraf government, as I said back in August, to focus on the problem of Islamic extremism in Pakistan.

And the fact that al-Qaeda and the Taliban have taken root in the northwest provinces, it is now starting to spill over into the rest of Pakistan. This poses a grave danger. Benzair Bhutto herself recognized increasingly that this was one of the greatest threats to Pakistan and also to stability in the region and to the United States of America. And we have to ensure that whoever is in power is taking that process seriously. The Washington Post has said in an editorial that Mr.

Obama committed a foul in some of your comments and some of your staff comments to the situation in Pakistan, specifically--let me ask you a question--do you believe that Senator Clinton's vote for, for the war in Iraq in any way, shape or form led to the events that transpired in Pakistan on Thursday?

Of course not, and that's never what any of my aides said. They responded to a question as to would this tragedy in Pakistan in some way advantage Senator Clinton as a consequence of her having been in Washington longer than I have. And my staff said that I think candidates will be judged based on the judgments they have made, and they made then an indisputable, I believe, comment, although The Washington Post, I think, may disagree with this.

And that is that, by going into Iraq, we got distracted from Afghanistan, we got distracted from hunting down bin Laden, we got distracted from dealing with the al-Qaeda havens that have been created in northwestern Pakistan. This is not an assertion simply from our campaign. This is what military commanders on the ground have indicated.

This is what our National Intelligence Estimates have shown, that al-Qaeda is stronger than at any time since And so if we are measuring who has the judgment to lead the country forward in dangerous times, I'm happy to put my record against those who have said, for example, that we will go along with President Bush on the war in Iraq.

barack obama meet the press 2007 guns

But a vote for the war in Iraq, in your mind, distracted us from Pakistan and that could have led to the situation? I, I am not drawing a causal relationship between any single vote in the tragedy there. The, the tragedy resulted from a suicide bomber. But what I do believe is that, if we are going to take seriously the problem of Islamic terrorism and the stability of Pakistan, then we have to look at it in a lighter context. What we do in Iraq matters, what we do with respect to Iran matters, what we do with respect to Musharraf matters and not giving him a blank check and conditioning military aid that's not related to terrorism on him opening up the election so that there's greater legitimacy and less anti-American sentiment in Pakistan.

Those are all parts of a broader foreign policy, and I believe that I'm best equipped to chart that new direction in foreign policy that will ultimately make American safer. You are a freshman senator, people have raised the issue of your experience, whether or not you're ready to be president. A former president by the name of William Jefferson Clinton addressed that very point. Let's watch "The Charlie Rose Show.

And we're prepared to roll the dice. It's less predictable, isn't it? I mean, when's the last time we elected a president based on one year of service in the Senate before he started running, and he will have been a senator longer by the time he's been inaugurated. But, essentially, once you start running for president full time you don't have time to do much else. Are we prepared to roll the dice? Is American rolling the dice on Barack Obama? You've been a senator just for a couple of years.

barack obama meet the press 2007 guns

You, you know, people, I think here in Iowa have been lifting the hood, kicking the tires, asking all the candidates questions. And the reason that we are doing well is that they recognize that the real gamble is for us to keep on doing the same thing over and over again, accept the conventional Washington wisdom, expect that somehow we're going to get different results from that.

They understand that if we want to solve healthcare, if we want to do something to make college more affordable, if we want a new foreign policy, then we have to have somebody who has a new vision for how we're going to move the country forward; somebody who has a track record of reducing special interests' and lobbyists' power in Washington; somebody who, on foreign policy issues, has shown the judgment that, in fact, bears out over time.

And that's the kind of leadership that I've shown, that's the reason we're doing well, and I suspect that that's where the people of Iowa are going to want to see the country, in a new direction. But when someone says, Senator, you've never had an executive position, you've never had to make executive decisions, you've only been in the Senate just two years, why don't you wait? Why'd you have to run now?

King talked about the fierce urgency of now. I think that there's such a thing as being too late. I don't want to wake up four years from now and find out we've been having the same arguments with the same lack of results.

I don't want to find out that more people don't have health insurance or that once again we've sent our troops in to fight a war that didn't need to be fought because nobody had the judgment or courage to ask the tough questions. Now, I have great respect for former President Clinton, and I would expect that he would defend his wife; you know, he is on the campaign trail at this point. I would simply point out that the same arguments that are being made with respect to me were made with respect to him back in '91, ' And I have more formal foreign policy experience than he did But he had been governor for 10 years.

Well, but that's my point. My point is, what happens is that when Washington gets challenged with respect to change, then their immediate response is "You haven't been in Washington long enough.

Texas became the 45th state to allow concealed-carry permit holders to openly tote their firearms on Jan. Concealed carry has been allowed in the state since the s with basically "zero problems," Lt.

barack obama meet the press 2007 guns

Having law-abiding citizens having guns is a good thing. The evidence for such a sweeping statement, we found, is lacking. He did not get back to us by deadline, but he could be referencing one by economist John Lott, president of the pro-gun Crime Prevention Research Center, and flubbing some of the details.

And the 25 percent refers to a decrease in murder rates across the nation as well as a decline in violent crime. According to the study, the number of concealed-handgun permits across the country has increased by percent from 4. Meanwhile, national murder rates have fallen from to by 25 percent, from 5. In an interview with PolitiFact, Lott noted that the third edition of his book More Guns, Less Crime, shows that murder rates decreased 1.

Over 10 years, that comes out to about 15 to 20 percent, he said.

barack obama meet the press 2007 guns